Providing liquidity to stablecoin pairs is one of the most popular DeFi strategies, offering relatively low risk and steady yield. But in 2026, two giants dominate the space: Uniswap V3 with its concentrated liquidity model, and Curve Finance with its specialized StableSwap pools. Which one earns you more on pairs like USDC/USDT?
In this comprehensive guide, we break down the mechanics, fee structures, capital efficiency, impermanent loss, and real yield of both protocols. We'll use real data and hypothetical scenarios to show you exactly where your stablecoins generate the highest returns—and at what risk.
➡️ Read next (recommended)
📋 Table of Contents
1. AMM Models: Uniswap V3 Concentrated Liquidity vs Curve StableSwap
Before comparing yields, it's essential to understand how each protocol handles stablecoin swaps.
Uniswap V3: Concentrated Liquidity
Active ManagementUniswap V3 allows LPs to concentrate their liquidity within a custom price range. For stable pairs (like USDC/USDT), you can set a narrow range (e.g., $0.99–$1.01) to simulate a stablecoin pool. This dramatically increases capital efficiency: your $10,000 can earn fees as if it were $100,000 in a V2-style pool—but only if the price stays within your range.
Curve Finance: StableSwap
Passive / OptimizedCurve uses a specialized invariant (StableSwap) that keeps prices nearly flat for assets that are expected to trade near peg (e.g., stablecoins). LPs provide liquidity across the entire price curve, but the formula concentrates most liquidity near the peg, minimizing slippage. This is a set-and-forget model: you don't need to choose a range, and IL is extremely low because stablecoins rarely de-peg significantly.
2. Fee Structures & Revenue Generation
Both protocols charge fees per swap, which are distributed to LPs. The fee percentage and the volume of swaps determine your yield.
| Protocol | Typical Fee (Stable Pairs) | Annual Volume (Example) | LP Revenue Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uniswap V3 (USDC/USDT 0.01%) | 0.01% | $50B | 100% of fees (minus gas for claims) |
| Uniswap V3 (USDC/USDT 0.05%) | 0.05% | $20B | 100% of fees |
| Curve (3pool / USDC-USDT) | 0.04% | $30B | 50% to LPs, 50% to veCRV holders (boosted if you lock CRV) |
Key observation: Uniswap's 0.01% tier attracts high-frequency, low-margin traders, generating enormous volume but very low fees per swap. Curve's 0.04% fee is slightly higher, but volume is also substantial. The net fee revenue depends heavily on the pool you choose and the market conditions.
3. Capital Efficiency & Concentration
Uniswap V3's main advantage is capital efficiency. By concentrating liquidity in a narrow range (e.g., ±1%), your capital works much harder. But this comes with the risk of the price moving out of range, causing your position to become inactive (earning zero fees) and exposing you to IL when you rebalance.
🧮 Capital Efficiency Math
Suppose you provide $10,000 in a Uniswap V3 USDC/USDT pool with a range of $0.99–$1.01. Your liquidity is concentrated as if you had $500,000 in a V2 pool. If the price stays within range, you earn fees proportional to $500,000, not $10,000. In practice, for stable pairs, the price almost always stays within that narrow range, so you achieve near-max efficiency.
Curve, on the other hand, uses your entire $10,000 but the entire pool's liquidity is balanced; your share of fees is based on your proportion of the total pool, not a virtual size.
4. Impermanent Loss on Stable Pairs
Impermanent loss (IL) occurs when the price of assets in a pool diverges. For stablecoins, IL is usually negligible because prices stay close to $1. However, during de-pegging events (like USDC's temporary de-peg in 2023), IL can be significant.
Uniswap V3 IL
If USDC drops to $0.98, your position may exit range, and you'll hold more of the de-pegged asset. Rebalancing locks in loss.
Curve IL
Curve's algorithm keeps IL minimal even during moderate de-pegs. You retain balanced exposure.
In 2026, stablecoin de-pegs are rarer but not impossible. Curve offers a safer haven if you're concerned about black-swan events.
5. Yield Simulations: $10,000 USDC/USDT (30-Day Period)
Let's model a realistic scenario using average on-chain data from early 2026. We'll assume total volume and fee distribution based on recent months.
| Pool | Avg Daily Volume | Pool TVL | Your Share | Daily Fees Earned | 30-Day Yield (est.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uniswap V3 0.01% (narrow range) | $500M | $200M | 0.005% | $2.50 | $75 (0.75%) |
| Uniswap V3 0.05% (narrow range) | $200M | $150M | 0.0067% | $6.70 | $201 (2.01%) |
| Curve 3pool (0.04%) | $300M | $500M | 0.002% | $2.40 | $72 (0.72%) |
| Curve + veCRV boost (max boost) | $300M | $500M | 0.002% (boosted 2.5x) | $6.00 | $180 (1.80%) |
Observations: The 0.05% Uniswap pool can yield significantly more if you pick the right fee tier and volume is strong. However, the 0.01% pool's high volume doesn't compensate for the tiny fee. Curve with a max veCRV boost approaches Uniswap's yield, but acquiring and locking CRV adds complexity and capital requirements.
📊 Realistic Takeaway
For a passive LP without CRV locks, Uniswap V3's 0.05% tier (narrow range) often outperforms Curve. But if you're willing to lock CRV and maintain a boost, Curve can be competitive—and safer from IL.
6. Strategy Guide: Which Pool Should You Choose?
Scenario A: You Want Maximum Yield, Active Management OK
- Choose: Uniswap V3 0.05% tier with a very tight range (e.g., $0.995–$1.005).
- Why: Highest capital efficiency; you'll capture a large share of swap fees.
- Risks: Need to monitor for de-pegs; occasional rebalancing required.
Scenario B: You Want Set-and-Forget, Minimal IL
- Choose: Curve 3pool (or USDC/USDT pool) with a modest CRV lock to boost rewards.
- Why: Low maintenance, lower IL, and boosted yield can approach Uniswap levels.
- Risks: CRV price volatility affects your overall return if you factor in token rewards.
Scenario C: You Have Large Capital (>$100k)
- Choose: Split between both: Uniswap for aggressive yield, Curve for stability.
- Why: Diversify IL risk while capturing high fees from Uniswap's concentrated pools.
7. Risks & Considerations in 2026
⚠️ Smart Contract Risk
Both Uniswap and Curve are battle-tested, but always assess audit history and insurance options. Consider using protocols like Nexus Mutual for coverage.
📉 De-pegging Events
Even in 2026, stablecoins can de-peg (regulatory action, liquidity crises). Curve handles de-pegs better; Uniswap narrow-range positions may suffer IL and become inactive. Have a plan: use stop-loss or monitoring tools.
⛽ Gas Costs & Rebalancing
Uniswap V3 may require periodic adjustments. On Ethereum L1, gas can eat profits. Consider L2s like Arbitrum or Optimism where both protocols have deep liquidity and lower fees.
Final Verdict: Uniswap vs Curve for Stable Pairs in 2026
For most retail LPs with moderate capital and a willingness to monitor positions, Uniswap V3's 0.05% tier with a tight range offers the highest yield on stable pairs like USDC/USDT. The capital efficiency simply outpaces Curve's passive model, especially if you avoid the de-peak risk.
However, if you prefer a truly passive experience, or if you're concerned about black-swan de-pegs, Curve with a veCRV boost is a close second and may be the better choice for larger, risk-averse capital.
Remember: yields fluctuate with volume and total value locked. Always check current rates on platforms like DeFi Llama before deploying.
✅ Keep Learning
Frequently Asked Questions
In normal conditions, no. But during a de-pegging event (e.g., USDC dropping to $0.95), IL can be significant, especially in Uniswap V3 narrow ranges. Curve's design minimizes IL because it rebalances the pool composition gradually.
The 0.05% tier generally offers the best balance between fee revenue and volume. The 0.01% tier requires enormous volume to match it, while the 0.30% tier attracts far less volume for stable pairs.
Yes. Without a veCRV boost, Curve's base yield is often lower than Uniswap's. By locking CRV (and voting for the pool's gauge), you can boost your LP rewards 2–2.5x, making it competitive.
Arbitrum and Optimism both have deep Uniswap and Curve liquidity. Arbitrum often has slightly higher volumes, while Optimism may have lower gas fees. Check current rates before depositing.
Yes, in extreme scenarios: a permanent de-peg (e.g., USDT collapsing) could cause significant IL. Also, smart contract hacks remain a risk. Diversify across platforms and consider insurance.